The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit recently affirmed the dismissal of a federal False Claims Act (FCA), 31 U.S.C. §§3729-3733, lawsuit brought by private citizen plaintiffs against various mortgage lenders and servicers for supposedly making false certifications regarding loans sold to Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. In so ruling, the Court held that Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac were not federal instrumentalities for purposes of the FCA, 31 U.S.C. § 3729(b)(2)(A)(i). A copy of the opinion in U.S. ex rel. Adams et al. v. Aurora Loan Services Inc. et al. is available at: Link to Opinion. The plaintiff…
Posts published in “Mortgage Banking Foreclosure Law”
Mortgage Banking Foreclosure Law
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit recently affirmed summary judgment against a putative class of borrowers who were allegedly victims of a captive reinsurance scheme by a lender and its affiliated reinsurance company. In so ruling, the Court held that the plaintiff borrowers’ claims were barred by the applicable statute of limitations, and the doctrine of equitable tolling did not apply because the plaintiff borrowers had not exercised reasonable diligence in investigating their potential claims. A copy of the opinion in Judith Cunningham v. M&T Bank Corp. is available at: Link to Opinion. The plaintiff borrowers financed the purchase…
In a case limited to nonjudicial foreclosures, the Supreme Court of California recently held that a borrower may maintain an action for wrongful foreclosure based on an allegedly void assignment. More specifically, the Court held that, “because in a nonjudicial foreclosure only the original beneficiary of a deed of trust or its assignee or agent may direct the trustee to sell the property, an allegation that the assignment was void, and not merely voidable at the behest of the parties to the assignment, will support an action for wrongful foreclosure.” The Court clarified that: “[w]e hold only that a borrower…
The Supreme Court of Tennessee recently affirmed judgment on the pleadings in favor of a tax sale purchaser, holding that although a party challenging the validity of a tax sale for lack of notice does not have to tender the amount owed before filing suit under the Tennessee tax sale statute, MERS had no protected interest in the property arising from the deed of trust’s designation of MERS as beneficiary and nominee for the lender or it being the alleged holder of bare legal title for the purpose of enforcing the lender’s rights. The Court held that, because MERS was…
The District Court of Appeal of the State of Florida, Fourth District, recently affirmed a final judgment of foreclosure in plaintiff mortgagee’s favor, holding that the plaintiff mortgagee was not required to send a second notice of default after it voluntarily dismissed its first foreclosure action before filing the second foreclosure action. A copy of the opinion in Michael E. Sill a/k/a Michael Sill v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association is available at: Link to Opinion. In April 2007, the borrower signed a promissory note and mortgage securing the loan, but defaulted on July 1, 2009. Pursuant to paragraph 22 of the mortgage, the mortgagee sent…
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit recently held that, under California law, a two-year delay in failing to investigate the facts entitling a party to rescind a foreclosure sale transaction barred that equitable remedy, even though there was a genuine issue of material fact as to whether the plaintiff foreclosure buyer could have discovered material defects before the foreclosure sale. A copy of the opinion in DM Residential Fund II v. First Tennessee Bank is available at: Link to Opinion. A mortgagee (“lender”) initiated a non-judicial foreclosure of residential real estate in California, and sold that property at a foreclosure sale to…
The District Court of Appeal of the State of Florida, Fourth District, recently affirmed the dismissal of a mortgage foreclosure action because the mortgagee failed to present competent, substantial evidence that it had standing to foreclose, due to lack of conformity between the name of the plaintiff mortgagee and the names in the transactional documentation by which the plaintiff mortgagee claimed an interest in the note at issue. A copy of the opinion in Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A. v. Dennis M. Conley, et al. is available at: Link to Opinion. A mortgagee filed a foreclosure action. The promissory note contained…
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit recently held that a bankruptcy court clearly erred in its finding that a debtor proposed a Chapter 11 plan in good faith, when the secured mortgagee would be paid only in part and very slowly after 10 years with no obligation by the debtor to maintain the building and obtain insurance, while a second class would be paid in full in two payments of $1,200 each over 60 days. In so ruling, the Sixth Circuit held that the artificial creation of an “impaired” class under section 1124(1) of the Bankruptcy Code,…
The District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District, recently held that a notice of assignment of a mortgage loan pursuant to the Florida Consumer Collection Practices Act (FCCPA) is not a condition precedent to filing a mortgage foreclosure action, but certified the question to the Florida Supreme Court for resolution as one of great public importance. A copy of the opinion in Brindise v. U.S. Bank National Association is available at: Link to Opinion. Husband and wife borrowers obtained a mortgage loan in 2005, which was later transferred to a new holder via “blank endorsement,” which under section 673.205(2) of Florida’s…
In a case that attracted a number of amici for both the borrower and the mortgagee, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit recently affirmed a trial court’s summary judgment ruling against a borrower holding that “the amount of a mortgage loan, by itself, cannot show substantive unconscionability under West Virginia law.” However, the Fourth Circuit allowed the borrower’s claim of “unconscionable inducement,” holding that the applicable West Virginia statute authorized such a claim “even when the substantive terms of a contract are not themselves unfair.” A copy of opinion in McFarland v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. is available at: Link…
The District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District, recently reversed a trial court’s order vacating a voluntary dismissal based on mistaken advice from counsel regarding the statute of limitations, holding that the voluntary dismissal was the result of a deliberate judgment by counsel, and not the type of non-judgmental, clerical mistake that Florida law recognizes as a basis to undo a voluntary dismissal. A copy of the opinion in Cottrell v. Taylor, Bean & Whitaker Mortgage Corp. is available at: Link to Opinion. In March 2013, borrowers created a land trust, naming their attorney as trustee. They then transferred to the…
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit recently held that a debtor in bankruptcy can pursue claims under the federal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act in district court for trying to collect a discharged debt, reversing a judgment dismissing the FDCPA claims and requiring the plaintiff seek relief in bankruptcy court. A copy of the opinion in Garfield v. Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC is available at: Link to Opinion. The debtor defaulted on her mortgage loan and filed for Chapter 13 bankruptcy, agreeing in her reorganization plan to pay the arrearage on her mortgage in monthly payments. The debtor received…