Press "Enter" to skip to content

Webinar: Collecting Statutory Prejudgment Interest – The FDCPA Risks

Collecting statutory prejudgment interest in California did not violate the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, under a decision earlier this month from the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. The decision, Diaz v Kubler, rejected the debtor’s contention that interest allowed by a California statute could not be collected unless a judgment was first entered.

Decision Has Limited Impact

While the decision brings clarity when collecting prejudgment interest in California, it does not authorize the collection of prejudgment interest under other state statutes. Last year, the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals found that a debt buyer’s collection of prejudgment interest under a Kentucky statute did violate the FDCPA. That decision, Stratton v. Portfolio Recovery Associates, found that the creditor who sold the debt had waived its right to collect any interest, making the debt buyer’s later effort to collect statutory interest impermissible by the waiver.

A State-by-State Inquiry Means Continued FDCPA Litigation

Statutes allowing the recovery of prejudgment interest contain varying requirements and conditions under which prejudgment interest can be recovered. Some do require the entry of judgment and some limit the conditions under which prejudgment interest can be charged.

Absent a federal law controlling the imposition of statutory interest on a debt, these varying state requirements and conditions mean there is no national standard for collection of prejudgment interest. Diaz and Stratton demonstrate that courts conduct a thorough analysis of prejudgment interest statutes as well as the facts surrounding the debt in determining whether prejudgment interest is authorized. You should expect litigation to continue when prejudgment interest is sought.

June 18 Webinar Will Explore Statutory Interest

I’ve put together a webinar to help identify the risks of charging statutory prejudgment interest. In addition to looking at Diaz and Stratton, Tom Dominczyk and I will look at several trial court decisions from around the nation, explore some state statutes and take your questions.

Join us on June 18 at 2 pm Eastern, 11 am Pacific, for this one hour webinar. There is no cost for the webinar. For those seeking credit for DBA International continuing education credit, the fee is $75.

Eventbrite - Collection of Prejudgment Interest - Latest Litigation Developments

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Donald Maurice provides counsel to the financial services industry, successfully litigating matters in the state and federal courts in individual and class actions. He has successfully argued before the Third, Fourth and Eighth Circuit U.S. Courts of Appeals, and has represented the financial services industry before several courts including as counsel for amicus curiae before the United States Supreme Court. He counsels clients in regulatory actions before the CFPB, and other federal and state regulators and in the development and testing of debt collection compliance systems. Don is peer-rated AV by Martindale-Hubbell, the worldwide guide to lawyers. In addition to being a frequent speaker and author on consumer financial services law, he serves as outside counsel to RMA International, on the governing Board of Regents of the American College of Consumer Financial Services Lawyers, and on the New York City Bar Association's Consumer Affairs Committee. From 2014 to 2017, he chaired the ABA's Bankruptcy and Debt Collection Subcommittee. For more information, see

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.