The District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District, recently upheld a trial court’s ruling that a plaintiff mortgage loan servicer had authority to initiate foreclosure proceedings against borrowers on a mortgage loan evidenced by an electronic note. The Fourth DCA also held that the e-note was a transferable record under the Uniform Electronic Transactions Act. A copy of the opinion in Rivera v. Wells Fargo Bank, NA is available at: Link to Opinion. In April 2008, the borrowers executed an electronic note (“e-note”) in favor of the lender, evidencing a loan secured by a mortgage. In January 2010, the servicer…
Posts published in “Foreclosure”
The Court of Appeal of the State of California, First Appellate District, recently upheld a trial court’s demurrer without leave to amend in a case in which a judicially noticed Purchase and Assumption Agreement (“P&A Agreement”) contradicted the borrower’s allegations that a subsequent purchaser of the loan had no authority to foreclose on her property. A copy of the opinion in Brown v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Company as Trustee for WAMU Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series et al. can be found at: Link to Opinion. In 2004, a borrower obtained a $450,000 loan secured by a deed of trust recorded against…
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit recently affirmed the dismissal of a borrower’s claims against her lender arising out of a foreclosure, holding among other things that alleged discrepancies as to the lender’s automatic payment withdrawal services did not state a claim under the Texas Deceptive Trade Practices Act (DTPA). In so ruling, the Court also affirmed the denial of a plaintiff borrower’s motion to join a non-diverse defendant holding that the motion was improperly brought for the purpose of defeating diversity jurisdiction. A copy of the opinion in Villarreal v. Wells Fargo Bank, NA is available at:…
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit recently held that a mortgagor is not a third-party beneficiary under a pooling and servicing agreement under New York law, and therefore lacks standing to challenge purported violations of assignments under the agreement. A copy of the opinion in In re Jepson is available at: Link to Opinion. A borrower executed a note for a loan secured by a mortgage. The note was indorsed by the lender in blank and transferred to a residential mortgage-backed securities trust formed and governed by a pooling and servicing agreement (“PSA”). The trust’s trustee held the…
The Third District Court of Appeal, State of Florida, recently reversed a final judgment of foreclosure because the plaintiff mortgagee alleged the same payment default as the basis for its prior 2008 and 2014 foreclosure actions. The Third DCA held that on remand the trial court should calculate the correct amount owed for principal and interest, excluding installments that became due more than five years prior to the filing of the second foreclosure action, in accordance with its en banc ruling in Deutsche Bank Trust Co. Americas v. Beauvais. A copy of the opinion in Collazo v. HSBC Bank USA, N.A. is…
The District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District, recently held that the trial court erred in ruling that a mortgagee failed to comply with the pre-foreclosure notice requirements of the mortgage, as the mortgagee’s default notice substantially complied with the mortgage and did not prejudice the borrower. The Court also held that testimony by the current loan servicer’s employee with regard to a prior loan servicer’s business records established sufficient foundation for the prior servicer’s records to be admitted into evidence as business records under Florida law. A copy of the opinion in The Bank of New York Mellon v.…
The District Court of Appeal of the State of Florida, Fifth District, recently affirmed a final judgment of foreclosure in favor of a mortgagee, holding that: a) the trial court did not abuse its discretion in determining that the bank’s witness was competent to testify about and in admitting the prior servicer’s loan history records into evidence; b) the default letter was not defective because it substantially complied with paragraph 22 of the mortgage; and c) the borrowers failed to present competent evidence that the loan was subject to Federal Housing Administration (FHA) regulations governing the servicing of federally insured…
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit recently held that a mortgagee did not waive or abandon its right to foreclose by accepting payments after a default by the borrower, but before acceleration, when no representations were made to the borrower that payments less than the full obligation would bring the loan current. A copy of the opinion in Martin v. Federal National Mortgage Association is available at: Link to Opinion. A borrower obtained a loan secured by a deed of trust (“DOT”). The DOT obligated the borrower to make monthly payments and gave the mortgagee the right to accelerate…
Withdrawing and substituting its prior opinion in Deutsche Bank Trust Co. America v. Beauvais, 40 Fla. L. Weekly D1 (Fla. 3d DCA Dec. 17, 2014), the District Court of Appeal of the State of Florida, Third District, on April 13 held that: Under Florida law, dismissal of a foreclosure action accelerating payment on one default does not bar a subsequent foreclosure action on a later default, if the subsequent default occurred within five years of the subsequent action; and Whether a dismissal is with or without prejudice is irrelevant to a lender’s right to file subsequent foreclosure actions on subsequent…
The District Court of Appeal of the State of Florida, Fourth District, recently reversed the dismissal of a mortgage foreclosure action, holding that the mortgagee was deprived of due process because the dismissal was entered sua sponte and without notice or opportunity to be heard, and because correction of an erroneous legal description did not require dismissal of the entire case. A copy of the opinion in Federal National Mortgage Association v. Astrid Sanchez, Botanica/Sea Plum Master Association, Inc., Sandpiper Cove at Botanica Condominium Association, Inc., and Carlos Navas is available at: Link to Opinion. A homeowner defaulted and the…
The District Court of Appeal of the State of Florida, Fourth District, recently reversed summary judgment of foreclosure in favor of a mortgagee, holding that the plaintiff mortgagee failed to satisfy its heightened burden of proving the absence of any genuine issue of material fact on the issue of standing applicable because the motion for summary judgment was filed before the defendant answered the complaint, and the plaintiff mortgagee was on notice at the time that the defendant was contesting standing. A copy of the opinion in Statewide Homeowners Solutions, LLC v. Nationstar Mortgage, LLC is available at: Link to Opinion. A homeowners…
The Third District Court of Appeal, State of Florida, recently reversed the dismissal of a mortgage foreclosure action based on the mortgagee’s failure to provide the name of the corporate representative who was to testify at trial, holding that dismissal was an overly harsh sanction given that no prejudice was shown. A copy of the opinion in Deutsche Bank Nat’l Trust Co. v. Perez, et al. is available at: Link to Opinion. In October 2009, the trustee of a mortgage-backed securities trust sued to foreclose a mortgage on real property in Miami-Dade County, Florida. In October 2014, the case was set for…