Withdrawing and substituting its prior opinion in Deutsche Bank Trust Co. America v. Beauvais, 40 Fla. L. Weekly D1 (Fla. 3d DCA Dec. 17, 2014), the District Court of Appeal of the State of Florida, Third District, on April 13 held that: Under Florida law, dismissal of a foreclosure action accelerating payment on one default does not bar a subsequent foreclosure action on a later default, if the subsequent default occurred within five years of the subsequent action; and Whether a dismissal is with or without prejudice is irrelevant to a lender’s right to file subsequent foreclosure actions on subsequent…
Posts published in April 2016
National financial services law firm Maurice Wutscher LLP has opened a new office in Birmingham, hiring financial services attorney Brent Yarborough to lead the firm’s Alabama litigation matters. Yarborough will practice in the firm’s Appellate, Commercial Litigation, Consumer Credit Litigation and Regulatory Compliance groups. He joins Maurice Wutscher’s skilled team of litigators who specialize in appellate matters, business formation and transactions, class action litigation, commercial litigation, construction litigation, consumer credit litigation, contested bankruptcies, contested foreclosures, employment litigation, equine law, insurance recovery and advisory services, intellectual property litigation, regulatory compliance, and trials and evidentiary hearings. Maurice Wutscher now has 15 offices…
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit recently held that the fact that a debt is in default at the time it is purchased by a third party does not necessarily make that third party a “debt collector” subject to the federal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA). Instead, the Court held that the respective definitions of “creditor” and “debt collector” under the FDCPA, 15 U.S.C. § 1692 et seq., control whether an entity is a debt collector subject to the FDCPA. A copy of the opinion in Ricky Henson v. Santander Consumer USA, Inc. is available at: Link…
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit recently vacated the dismissal of federal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA) allegations that a debt collector’s notice stating the “current balance” of the debt without disclosing that the balance may increase over time due to interest and fees was “misleading” within the meaning of Section 1692e. A copy of the opinion in Avila v. Riexinger & Associates, LLC is available at: Link to Opinion. The defendant debt collector sent collection notices to the plaintiff debtors notifying them that their accounts were placed for collection. The notices stated the “current balance,” but…
The U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado recently denied a debt collector’s motions to dismiss FDCPA allegations that the debt collector’s statements made to the borrower’s attorney during settlement negotiations and statements made to the state court in court filings constitute a violation of the FDCPA, ruling that “none of the provisions implicated in [the borrower’s] claim should be dismissed on the basis that the alleged abusive conduct was communicated to third parties other than the consumer.” A copy of the opinion in Chung v. Lamb is available at: Link to Opinion. The debt collector’s employee contacted the…
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit recently affirmed a district court’s dismissal of a qui tam action alleging that a bank violated the federal False Claims Act when it certified that it had engaged in loss mitigation and sought FHA insurance payments on defaulted loans, holding that because the factual basis of the claim was publicly disclosed before suit was filed, only the government could pursue the action in its own name. A copy of the opinion in United States ex rel. ABLE v. U.S. Bank, N.A. is available at: Link to Opinion. The defendant bank participated in…